<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Albums of 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://downandoutmusic.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/top-10-albums-of-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://downandoutmusic.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/top-10-albums-of-2006/</link>
	<description>Every day should come as some surprise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jizzools</title>
		<link>http://downandoutmusic.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/top-10-albums-of-2006/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jizzools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downandoutmusic.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/top-10-albums-of-2006/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Okay, here&#039;s my requisite &quot;Alex is a dumb bastard&quot; post. CSS did not release the album of the year based on one fookin&#039; song. If  I released an album containing one red-hot single and 9 other tracks of fart noises put through a phaser with Les Claypool on bass, would that be album of the year? No.

The Warning - Yes, this is a top album. However, Muse should have won the Mercury music prize, for two simple reasons.

1) They managed to put Queen, Prince and Radiohead in a blender and come out with good music, rather than some kind of turd parfait.

2) The video for Knights of Cydonia.

If that&#039;s not the best thing ever, I dont know what is. And it does have appeal to electro-fucks. Listen to Supermassive Black Hole, and tell me it doesn&#039;t. Also, Over And Over the best song of the decade? We&#039;re barely halfway through you arsehole!

The Pipettes - I think there you&#039;re just indulging your love for a bunch of sheilas singing in harmony, you camp bastard. You&#039;re camper than a row of pink tents wearing stockings in a kickline in Millets.

Arctic Monkeys? I thought you might do something interesting here, a post-backlash reappraisal? But no, you just stuck it on because of the hype and dead zeitgeist. Also, indie hitting the mainstream is like HIV hitting Africa. Not. Good.

The Guillemots - I&#039;ve heard their whole album, and had to listen to a couple of tracks to write this, because they&#039;re just like Coldplay. Instantly forgettable, with each song blending into the other like Angel Delight. Cock-flavour Angel Delight.

Now, I love Sufjan Stevens even more than you Alex, but it was a christing outtakes album! Actually, still better than the rest of the list.

The Holloways. Sub-Chas and Dave, post-Libertines, Larrikin Love retread of how crap England is. The cunts even formed at Nambucca.

Dirty Pretty Things. I reckon that&#039;s how Carl Barat describes his own lumpen shite.

Lily Allen. Alright, she&#039;s pretty good. I&#039;ll give you this one.

Aluminium. Orchestral reworkings of the White Stripes. I can see this for Pink Floyd, because both Pink Floyd and opera are liked by fat redfaced men in their forties, but the White Stripes? What cuntage is this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, here&#8217;s my requisite &#8220;Alex is a dumb bastard&#8221; post. CSS did not release the album of the year based on one fookin&#8217; song. If  I released an album containing one red-hot single and 9 other tracks of fart noises put through a phaser with Les Claypool on bass, would that be album of the year? No.</p>
<p>The Warning &#8211; Yes, this is a top album. However, Muse should have won the Mercury music prize, for two simple reasons.</p>
<p>1) They managed to put Queen, Prince and Radiohead in a blender and come out with good music, rather than some kind of turd parfait.</p>
<p>2) The video for Knights of Cydonia.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s not the best thing ever, I dont know what is. And it does have appeal to electro-fucks. Listen to Supermassive Black Hole, and tell me it doesn&#8217;t. Also, Over And Over the best song of the decade? We&#8217;re barely halfway through you arsehole!</p>
<p>The Pipettes &#8211; I think there you&#8217;re just indulging your love for a bunch of sheilas singing in harmony, you camp bastard. You&#8217;re camper than a row of pink tents wearing stockings in a kickline in Millets.</p>
<p>Arctic Monkeys? I thought you might do something interesting here, a post-backlash reappraisal? But no, you just stuck it on because of the hype and dead zeitgeist. Also, indie hitting the mainstream is like HIV hitting Africa. Not. Good.</p>
<p>The Guillemots &#8211; I&#8217;ve heard their whole album, and had to listen to a couple of tracks to write this, because they&#8217;re just like Coldplay. Instantly forgettable, with each song blending into the other like Angel Delight. Cock-flavour Angel Delight.</p>
<p>Now, I love Sufjan Stevens even more than you Alex, but it was a christing outtakes album! Actually, still better than the rest of the list.</p>
<p>The Holloways. Sub-Chas and Dave, post-Libertines, Larrikin Love retread of how crap England is. The cunts even formed at Nambucca.</p>
<p>Dirty Pretty Things. I reckon that&#8217;s how Carl Barat describes his own lumpen shite.</p>
<p>Lily Allen. Alright, she&#8217;s pretty good. I&#8217;ll give you this one.</p>
<p>Aluminium. Orchestral reworkings of the White Stripes. I can see this for Pink Floyd, because both Pink Floyd and opera are liked by fat redfaced men in their forties, but the White Stripes? What cuntage is this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
